Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
I have been accused of being a stickler for precise language. Guilty as charged. I believe the exchange of ideas that is facilitated by language is truly miraculous; and it's critical that we strive to communicate with each other as accurately as possible. Language is, by far, the skill that has enabled humans to realize more success than any other species in this planet's history.
As is the case with most things, language's greatest strength is also it's greatest weakness. Because it is based on abstraction, there is plenty of wiggle room. We can say things that come close to what we mean, and people will still get it (if only computers worked this way!). On the other hand, we can say things and people will understand something we never intended.
What does this have to do with redundancy? Well, this is a lament about the general lack of precision in our language; particularly our tendency to use modifiers with words and phrases that already describe an idea accurately. Some examples: male model, reverse discrimination, proactive, pre-board, pre-condition, pre-enroll, pre-qualify. This trend of sticking pre- in front of a word to create a new word is especially troubling. The new word doesn't change the meaning of the word it modifies, but for some reason it takes on a cachet the existing word didn't have by itself.
Also, don't people know "AM" means morning? Unfortunately, I hear something like this fairly often: "Some idiot called my house at 3 AM in the morning."
I realize there's probably no harm done as long as the general idea is communicated. This may be true in the short term, but I think communication will ultimately suffer as a result. The idea that racial discrimination is different depending on the race of the one who is discriminated against, or that you can qualify before you qualify is just silly. Perceptions will be shifted. Precision will be lost.
Labels: rant


